Hello, On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 02:27:13PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: > > Why did you choose SVN? It's not any better than CVS, it has the same > lacks, like not being able to manage unix rights, which is really the > basic. Why don't you upgrade to Git or Mercurial which are REALLY a LOT > better?
> The very big advantage of Git is that everybody can have it's own public > repository and just send you the URL so you can pull from it. I choose nothing. SVN is the SCM of pkg-php team, where there are some pear-modules in team maintenance. I agree that GIT is great but for storing pear-modules packages I don't care about using CVS, SVN, ARCH, GIT or whatever SCM. > > I plan to improve "Requirements for PHP PEAR libraries"[*] to > > have a common policy for all PHP PEAR modules (common packaging, > > short/long description, procedures to request a new PHP PEAR > > module package or updating) in order to facilitate team > > maintainance and have high-quality and uptodate PHP PEAR > > packages. > > > > [*] > > http://webapps-common.alioth.debian.org/draft-php/html/ch-php-libs.html#s-php-libs-pear > > This is a VERY good idea, and I think it will help a lot to improve the > pear package. Thanks for writing this. Ok, it sounds good. Regards, -- Gregory Colpart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GnuPG:1024D/C1027A0E Evolix - Informatique et Logiciels Libres http://www.evolix.fr/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
