2007/9/11, Jens Seidel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 03:38:06PM +0200, Bas Wijnen wrote: > > I uploaded the package. I still have some comments (see below), but > > they weren't enough reason to not upload. > > Thanks. > > > On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 12:20:11AM +0200, Jens Seidel wrote: > > > > this is a "GPL without version" claim, which according to the GPL > > > > means any version is acceptable. I > > > > > > It's still "GPL without version". I need the permission of Miriam and > > > maybe others before I can change it. > > > > Strictly speaking, you don't. You can choose to accept any version, for > > example "all versions >= 2", like the game itself is licensed. Then you > > have the right to distribute using that license. > > > > However, I agree it is nice to ask people what they intended, and not > > remove license options without reason. > > OK, will probably do this with the next upload.
Go ahead Jens, no problem at all :) The idea was mainly: "This patch is released under the same license as the game itself and the packaging", but whatever license or text you prefer will be OK for me :) You can change it yourself if you want, but if you prefer to do it formally nice, just tell me the text you prefer and I'll do the commit myself :) The idea is that not only the program itself and the packaging have a license, but also the patches do have a copyright and license. Maybe the best text would be "This patch is licensed undet the same license as the program, see debian/copyright" or something like that. Greetings, Miry -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
