> > * the package looks good, it is lintian/linda clean and builds in cowbuilder > > * Why not to join the PAPT team and let it maintain as part of it? > > > > http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/PythonAppsPackagingTeam > > Sounds nice, but I want to keep using git rather than subversion. :(
Right. I think it should be possible. There is http://git.debian.org/ , so I don't see a reason why you couldn't use git. Piotr? > > * the version should be 0.6.3.1.dfsg-1 instead of 0.6.3.1+ds-1 > > Well, I'm not repackaging the tarball to make it DFSG-free; merely to > remove the un-needed copy of PyX that upstream ships (to make it easier > for end users to install PyXPlot). I chose 'ds' to stand for 'Debian > Source' as I've seen other packages do it. You are right, sorry about that. > > * just curious - why is the python-scipy build dependency needed? > > PyXPlot is run during build time to generate the graphs that end up in > the documentation and examples. I see. Maybe - wouldn't it be better to create a package pyxplot-doc? Since the main program is pretty small, so that people don't have to install the whole 1MB package if they just need to use pyxplot. Ondrej -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
