Am Dienstag, den 27.11.2007, 06:14 +1100 schrieb Matt Palmer: > On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 03:44:14PM +0000, Daniel Leidert wrote:
[..] > > But: the packages for the plugin and the applications are very small, so > > I think creating own -dbg packages for them is not sufficient. But am I > > allowed to create just one -dbg package for all relevant packages? If > > yes, would it be ok to put all debugging symbols in the libfoo-dbg > > package or better in a foo-dbg package? > > I think it would be reasonable to put all of the symbols into the one dbg > package. Thanks to you and Neill for your answers. I now saw, that libxml2 does the same. So I added a libfoo-dbg package and put all debugging symbols in it. Regards, Daniel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
