Hi list, I received #456871. This happens since tdb-dev was upgraded from '1.1.0-1+b1' to '1.1.1~svn26294-1', because 'usr/include/tdb.h' uses 'sig_atomic_t' without including <signal.h>.
I could work around that problem quite simply. However, I think it would be preferable, if 'tdb.h' would be fixed. My question is, if it would be the right thing to do is to reassign the bug to tdb-dev and add a comment about signal.h to it? Or should I rather create a new bug against tdb-dev about the problem? Regards, Frank <http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=456871> <http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2007/12/17/fdm_1.4-1_sid32.buildlog> -- In protocol design, perfection has been reached not when there is nothing left to add, but when there is nothing left to take away. -- RFC 1925 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
