2008/1/20, Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I believe that you should either license your packaging work under the > same license as the upstream source or add an exception to the licensing > on your packaging work to allow it to be linked with OpenSSL.
I think simple patches are not eligible for copyright, but I understand your point and changed packaging license to the POCO license. > I didn't build this package to double-check, but I expect this lintian tag > is correct as far as it goes and isn't a bug. It looks like you have a > package named libpoco2 which doesn't contain a shared library named > libpoco.so.2. > > It is a place where an override is probably justified, however. That's right. I put updated package to mentors.d.n: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/poco/poco_1.2.9-3.dsc As Aníbal told me that hi is a bit busy, could you upload it? Regards, -- Krzysztof Burghardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.burghardt.pl/
