Hi David, * David Paleino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-02-12 15:10]: > Il giorno Tue, 12 Feb 2008 14:53:21 +0100 > Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto: > > * David Paleino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-02-12 14:50]: > > [...] > > > I usually sign all my emails -- but when I include commands to the BTS I > > > cannot do that, as the GPG header is "confusing" the server. > > > > > > So, this is how you would do it. I add more to the original question: is > > > it > > > possible to send GPG-signed mails to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > What problems did you experience? Cause I sign all my mails > > no matter if they go to the control address or not and never > > had any problem with that. > > To be honest, last time I tried sending a signed mail to control@ was > something > like a year ago. Something may have changed since then, since I've just made a > "test mail" (see #455005). But I've also changed something: now I send my GPG > signature as "PGP/MIME", before I was sending it as "PGP/Inline". I bet that > control@ can't handle PGP/Inline signed messages.
Yes this seems to be the reason then :) Cheers Nico -- Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-rot13 encrypted. http://people.debian.org/~nion/sponsoring-checklist.html
pgpXnTiaIpfnt.pgp
Description: PGP signature
