Mauro Lizaur wrote:
Hi Andreas,
I'm not a DD or a DM, but i while i was checking your package i got
these lintian warnings:
I: uniconvertor: arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share 1668kB 87%
N:
N: The package has a significant amount of architecture-independent data
N: in /usr/share, while it is an architecture-dependent package. This is
N: wasteful of mirror space and bandwidth, as we then end up with
N: multiple copies of this data, one for each architecture.
N:
N: If the data in /usr/share is not architecture-independent, it is a
N: policy violation, and in this case, you should move that data
N: elsewhere.
N:
N: See also:
N: http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-best-pkging-practice
N: s#s-bpp-archindepdata
N:
As I understand it; this is a "warning" if you have a lot of extra-files
like examples or data-files. Then this should go in a dedicated -data
package. The warning appears as the package has some C-code and some
python scripts, and it sees the pyton scripts as extra-files. So I
believe it should be fair to ignore.
W: uniconvertor: script-not-executable
./usr/share/pycentral/uniconvertor/site-packages/uniconvertor/__init__.py
N:
N: This file starts with the #! sequence that marks interpreted scripts,
N: but it is not executable.
N:
Looking into other python-packages, this seems to always be
non-executable; that's why I let it be. But if this is wrong, I will of
course change it.
i would recommend you to check these, and try to make it work for all
the versions of python available (ie 2.4 and 2.5, now just builds for
python 2.4)
Right now it builds for the default python-version avaible. If the
default change, a recompile is the only thin needed. Is it better
practice to have it build itself for multiple python-versions at the
same time?
Cheers,
Andreas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
