Joe Smith wrote: > > I am not a DD or DM, nor have I checked your actual packaging, but your > explanations of the changes made sound reasonable sane. Obviously it would > be nice for true 64 bit versions to eventually be built, but those changes > sound like they should result in working 32 bit executables for all > architectures. (Warning: I have no actual experence with that, this is > just merely a comment that what you said sounds sane). > > HTH.
Thanks for your comments. As no other issue found, now uploading the package. Cheers, -- Atomo64 - Raphael Please avoid sending me Word, PowerPoint or Excel attachments. See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]