Joe Smith wrote:
> 
> I am not a DD or DM, nor have I checked your actual packaging, but your
> explanations of the changes made sound reasonable sane. Obviously it would
> be nice for true 64 bit versions to eventually be built, but those changes
> sound like they should result in working 32 bit executables for all
> architectures. (Warning: I have no actual experence with that, this is
> just merely a comment that what you said sounds sane).
> 
> HTH.

Thanks for your comments.
As no other issue found, now uploading the package.

Cheers,
-- 
Atomo64 - Raphael

Please avoid sending me Word, PowerPoint or Excel attachments.
See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to