On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 10:28:49PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote: > > Because LibTorrent is _not_ part of the rtorrent upstream tarball. > > Well, there's one reason to ship it separately then :). I thought libtorrent > was > part of the rtorrent source. > > > They're shipped individually [...] > > More reason then to keep them separate. > > > > > Installing LibTorrent in [...] > > Ok then. I was not aware of that other software.
I agree that we should keep packages separate (although I never said the
contrary), but my opinion about the name of libtorrent10 package (name
of the package, _not_ the library) is still the same: what is the
rationale for a lib${PROTOCOL_NAME} _package_ name?
Are you assuming that only that library implementing the protocol will
be part of the distribution? Or should we consider it as a kind of
"favourite" library just because it was packaged before others?
Regards,
Cristian
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
