Mauro Lizaur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The thing is that the format of the url [1] is something similar to > http://host/release.zip where you can't see if it has a new release > or anything.
It can't hurt to ask upstream to make release archives with the version string in the filename. That would be the ideal situation, and you could then encode that in the 'debian/watch' file. > And i don't know if i should add a lintian-override, Rather than an override, you can simply add a 'debian/watch' file that has (only) comments explaining the current situation. > add a watch file with the url [1] anyway That wouldn't be any use. An empty watch file (with comments) is better than this. > or to contact the upstream author and ask him if he could change the > URL to something where the watch file can tell if there's a new > version. Best of luck with this. -- \ “The trouble with eating Italian food is that five or six days | `\ later you're hungry again.” —George Miller | _o__) | Ben Finney -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
