> I meant on the report; there are copyright and licence issues in some of the > files. I read your copyright notes in svn and i found all copyright problems in tests and demos but i deleted these directory in my first package release so I deleted also copyright notices. Now I'm going to package also test files so I'll restore some of that in copyright info.
> Btw, that package naming schema is used by perl but not php. IMHO it would > be better to use zend-framework or if you really insist: > libphp-zenf-framework. For the naming I used the PHP Policy Draft 4.1 http://webapps-common.alioth.debian.org/draft-php/html/ch-php-libs.html#s-php-libs-naming This document is valid or outdated? If this is correct probably the best name is libzend-framework-php > Oh, and also consider shipping the extra documentation (either in the same > or different package); and running the test suite[1] at build time would be > even better JFTR. Sure, when this packages is ok I will package extra documentation... > [1] And there's a patch that is needed for one the pdf generation tests > which is in SVN. Uhm... the patch seems to be for the demo pdf > And finally, don't forget to retitle the WNPP bug and set yourself as the > owner, and consider joining the pkg-php group so you use the team's svn > repo and co-maintain it with the others (at least Aleksey Zapparov was also > interested in packaging it). Ok. Thank you for your help. Andrea -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
