OoO En ce début de soirée du jeudi 04 septembre 2008, vers 21:18, Stefanos Harhalakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait :
> I fixed them all in the debian package and added the man page fix
> to "upstream" too for the next release. I've also removed the Makefile.in
> modifications, config.sub, config.guess and the following lines from
> debian/rules:
> ifneq "$(wildcard /usr/share/misc/config.sub)" ""
> cp -f /usr/share/misc/config.sub config.sub
> endif
> ifneq "$(wildcard /usr/share/misc/config.guess)" ""
> cp -f /usr/share/misc/config.guess config.guess
> endif
You can keep those lines.
> I also have a question. Should I change anything else in debian/rules to
> indicate that this is not an architecture dependend package? I don't like
> seeing the file: vbackup_0.1.6-2_i386.changes (why i386 and not all?).
> Everything is listed as binary-indep but should I also modify the configure
> line to remove --host, --build, CFLAGS and LDFLAGS?
No, your package is currently arch independant because in
debian/control, you have "Architecture: all". The arch in .changes is
the arch used to compile the packages. Your .deb is:
vbackup_0.1.6.1-1_all.deb
> The latest version (-2) is available in mentors.
I wait for you to add back lines about putting a more up-to-date
config.sub and config.guess. They are not outdated right now but they
could be in some distant future.
--
printk("Illegal format on cdrom. Pester manufacturer.\n");
2.2.16 /usr/src/linux/fs/isofs/inode.c
pgpKOVMsHu4X9.pgp
Description: PGP signature
