Rafael Laboissiere wrote: ... > > octave3.0-mscripts (although, there will be other files than *.m in > the > package) ... > > Suggestions? >
Why not just octave3.0-scripts? (note the missing 'm'). It would make more sense than a -data or -common package to me as it really describes the content. Cheers, -- Atomo64 - Raphael Please avoid sending me Word, PowerPoint or Excel attachments. See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
