Hello Charles In particular, I use the package, not very consistently (fortunately not always make mistakes to erase my pictures). But many of my friends and colleagues use it regularly, IMHO should be into Debian a little longer.
Thanks 2008/10/7 Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Le Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 09:32:22PM -0500, William Vera a écrit : >> >> recoverjpeg just looks for a jpeg structure into the file system and >> photorec appears be a more complete suite for recover files, both to >> differents usages. > > Le Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 11:51:41AM +0800, Paul Wise a écrit : >> >> A year ago I tried to get recoverjpeg, recoverPhotos and PhotoRec to >> merge into PhotoRec, at the time it appeared there was no difference >> between recoverjpeg and PhotoRec. Of course there was no action on the >> part of any of the upstreams. > > Hi William, > > if you like and use recoverjpeg, and think it is worth being packaged, > go ahead. But if your concern is to get the package into better shape > for the sake of Debian's quality and excellence, please consider > investigating if the package can be removed instead. This would also be > a very valuable contribution to Debian. > > PS: you may be interested in the pkg-phototools project: > http://pkg-phototools.alioth.debian.org/ > > Have a nice day, > > -- > Charles Plessy > Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- William Vera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PGP Key: 1024D/F5CC22A4 Fingerprint: 3E73 FA1F 5C57 6005 0439 4D75 1FD2 BF96 F5CC 22A4 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
