On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 10:01 PM, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> could be in main? (so is dfsg) Yes. > I think that yes, but I must admit that the legal stuff is something unclear > to me. Something as the classical licenses are clear, but this custom makes > me crazy. It is just the 3-clause BSD license with references to the University of California and the warranty disclaimer removed. Compare it with /usr/share/common-licenses/BSD -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
