On Monday 24 November 2008 00:19:14 Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 08:42:43PM +0200, George Danchev wrote: > > * slight regression: dpatch was introduced in that revision, but the > > 01_manhyphens_patch.dpatch is not applied during build. Basically you > > don't need to call dpatch <option> but include > > /usr/share/dpatch/dpatch.make instead and call patch and unpatch targets > > it provides for you. If in doubt you can check with poco source package > > for example and use it as a reference. > > > > * slight improvement: while we are at it, you ca upgrade to debhelper v5 > > or better yet use v7 and its wonderful command sequencer called dh(1) in > > order to shorten your debian/rules. I don't insist on v7 though, so use > > it at your convenience. > > I /believe/, after a lot of headaches, that this is done now :) > I have taken all the cruft out of debian/rules and replaced it with a > configure target and calls to the patch and unpatch targets, and it > builds now including the patch.
Ah, causing headaches was not my intention, indeed ;-) so I'd generally like to know about the troubles you have faced. Now, the package looks well done to me. > If you could take a look and consider sponsoring, the updated dsc is at: > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gxemul/gxemul_0.4.6.6-2.dsc Uploaded. I also didn't forget to include both of your entries in the changes file. Thanks for your work! Btw, the author is slowly but steadily progressing at the C++ rewrite, which I consider a very good idea. -- pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB 2003-03-18 <people.fccf.net/danchev/key pgp.mit.edu> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
