-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Matthew Palmer a écrit : > On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 01:37:48PM +0100, Laurent Guignard wrote: >> I have another question about architecture : >> How is it possible to check if a package could be built on architecture >> without the appropriate hardware ? >> I can say that dhcp-probe could be build on i386 and any compatible >> architectures and with the upstream notes, i can say that dhcp-probe >> could be built on sparc but how to test on other architectures ? > > You don't test it yourself. When it's uploaded with Arch: any, it gets > built on all architectures. If the build fails, you'll be notified of it > (via a bug). Those bugs then get fixed. If it builds, but fails to run > properly on an arch, then someone will find that out and lodge a bug too. > >>>> The /etc/default/dhcp-probe directory is used to store all configuration >>>> files needed (one for each interface on which dhcp-probe is used). I >>>> thought that it was the best solution instead of spreading all >>>> configuration files directly in /etc. >>> dh_installinit will automatically put a default file in place if >>> asked nicely. See the appropriate man page for more details. >> Yes, dh_installinit will automatically put *a* default file in place. >> As you noticed, it place *A* default file. >> That i would like to do, is to place at least one file and i doesn't >> know how many because it depends of the number of network interfaces the >> host on which the package is installed has ! > > Uhm... no. That's not how it's done. /etc/default/<file> is a shell > fragment that configures the operation of /etc/init.d/<file>. /etc/default > is not a place for random config junk because you don't want to mkdir > /etc/<package>. > > I repeat: DO NOT put your package's general config data in /etc/default. Put > all that configuration data in /etc/dhcp-probe. If the init scripts for the > package are currently structured such that there is one init script per > configured interface, someone needs to learn to use for loops. > > - Matt > > OK, i didn't understand this. Yes, i didn't think about the /etc/<package> possibility... May be it is due to my poor english ;) Have a good week-end. Best regards - -- Laurent Guignard, Registered as user #301590 with the Linux Counter Site : http://www.famille-guignard.org Blog : http://blog.famille-guignard.org Projet : http://sicontact.sourceforge.net GULL de Villefranche sur Saône : http://www.cagull.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFJMoU/jcKpXFc/7oYRAn1wAJ9Lr72r9ViT99sqjcM1/U+YArwQigCfSgs+ gBL7HrUHZ9F60pSW2X0pJsU= =thZ6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
