On Sunday 18 January 2009 19:24:05 Neil Williams wrote: > On Sun, 18 Jan 2009 16:37:20 +0100 > > Olivier Berger <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi. > > > > Le dimanche 18 janvier 2009 à 12:24 +0000, Neil Williams a écrit : > > > ... I'm now going to require, for any package > > > using debconf that requires sponsorship, that debconf translations are > > > requested and updated by the maintainer on an ongoing basis. > > > > You mean "that requires [my] sponsorship" ? > > Anything I review or sponsor - a successful review must precede > sponsoring so if I'm going to sponsor, this criterion is applied at the > review stage and a failure for this criterion - even if all others are > prefect - will cause a rejection.
Everything you wrote makes a lot of sense and I think we should submit these suggestons to Developers News at some point. One question remains though: how many translations we want in order to qualify a debconf-using package translated enough so it can be uploaded. That might sound trivial, but I don't have any good answers myself for now. -- pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB 2003-03-18 <people.fccf.net/danchev/key pgp.mit.edu> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
