Michele Baldessari wrote: > Hi Luk, > > On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 23:49 +0100, Luk Claes wrote: >> [Note: I'm not subscribed to the list, please Cc me in replies.] > > Sorry for the late reply, but you misstyped my e-mail (puparazzo instead > of pupazzoo) > so I managed to see your mail just now.
Oh sorry. >> Your package [1] has a dpatch in debian/patches, but there doesn't seem >> to be any rule to actually (de)apply it nor any build dependency on dpatch? > > Ops, just a leftover of a patch that was needed in versions < 1.0.8. > Removed > in svn trunk. Ok >> I thought dpkg-statoverride was meant to make it possible for the >> sysadmin to override the package's permissions, but you first >> unconditionally set the permissions and only afterwards call >> dpkg-statoverride, how is that supposed to work? > > I reread the old threads on debian-mentors, and given that there is no > prior package and > www-data is in base-passwd, dpkg-statoverride is not needed (although > [1] seems to > imply that dpkg-statoverride should be used everytime a permission is > changed in postinst) > > So I removed the postinst change and changed dh_fixperms appropriately > in trunk. Thanks for noticing and let me know if you'd like me to upload > a 1.0.8-2 to mentors. Please do and ping me for upload, TIA. Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
