On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 1:04 AM, Matthias Julius <[email protected]> wrote:
> I would really be grateful if someone could take a look at this > package and possibly upload it for me. You build-depend on libdb-dev, in sid that depends on libdb4.7-dev but the current dnshistory package is built against libdb4.6. Should you add another debian/NEWS entry about this? I'm not sure what to do in this situation, could you investigate? Only the above is a blocker, some other things you may want to look at: Please use $(QUILT_STAMPFN) instead of patch in debian/rules. Please make build-stamp depend on configure-stamp. ./configure gets run twice on my machine in pbuilder due to the above two issues. For some reason the mktime test in ./configure takes ages and a lot of CPU in pbuilder and then fails. I get one dpkg-shlibdeps warning, please ask upstream to remove -lm from the link flags: dependency on libm.so.6 could be avoided if "debian/dnshistory/usr/bin/dnshistory" were not uselessly linked against it (they use none of its symbols). I get one lintian pedantic complaint: P: dnshistory: copyright-refers-to-symlink-license usr/share/common-licenses/GPL You might want to review the debtags and upload a screenshot: http://debtags.alioth.debian.org/edit.html?pkg=dnshistory http://screenshots.debian.net/package/dnshistory -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
