Le Mon, Jun 01, 2009 at 12:34:10PM +0200, David Paleino a écrit : > > Also in RFC822: > > 4.7.5. USER-DEFINED-FIELD > > Individual users of network mail are free to define and > use additional header fields. Such fields must have names > which are not already used in the current specification or in > any definitions of extension-fields, and the overall syntax of > these user-defined-fields must conform to this specification's > rules for delimiting and folding fields. Due to the > extension-field publishing process, the name of a user- > defined-field may be pre-empted > > Note: The prefatory string "X-" will never be used in the > names of Extension-fields. This provides user-defined > fields with a protected set of names.
Hi David and all, after reading the following thread on [email protected], I got convinced that using a X- prefix is not a good idea: http://lists.debian.org/debian-policy/2009/03/msg00343.html Just using fields that are not yet formally described seems more human-readable, as well as time-saving. Have a nice day, -- Charles Plessy Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
