In <135eeb1d0906241156q69cfcf9fqeb7bfbe733ddc...@mail.gmail.com>, Juan Jesús Ojeda Croissier wrote: >> * The version numbering is for "native package" without reason. > >Well, this is a native package, I think. Maybe I'm wrong with the >meaning of that but the sotfware was created for Guadalinex and it >came with the packaging stuff. It not an upstream projects that we're >packaging. >Please, tell me if I'm wrong.
You are wrong. :P To use native packaging instead of normal packaging, the software should be of virtually no possible use to non-Debian-derived distributions. If you can think of *any* reason that openSUSE, Fedora, or Gentoo would want to use the software (albeit with different packaging) you should use normal (non-native) packaging. -- Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. ,= ,-_-. =. b...@iguanasuicide.net ((_/)o o(\_)) ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy `-'(. .)`-' http://iguanasuicide.net/ \_/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
