> On Mon, 6 Jul 2009 13:25:04 +0200 > > Sebastian Harl <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 05, 2009 at 01:59:17PM +0100, Tony Houghton wrote: > > > Before I try uploading it again, it occurred to me that as 1.15.1-1 > > > hasn't been released, should I remove its entry from the changelog and > > > add its changes to the section for 1.15.2-1? > > > > Imho, that's mostly up to your personal preferences. Some care should be > > taken if you've closed bugs in older, unreleased changelog entries - the > > entry should be included in .changes then to have those bugs closed > > automatically in the BTS (see dpkg-buildpackage's -v option). Besides > > that there is not much difference (imho), even though I prefer to have > > only one changelog entry for each upload. > > I chose to merge the changelog. I've uploaded 1.15.2-1 again and this > time it's showing up, so I'd be grateful for the attention of potential > sponsors.
Sure, fixing bugs is always welcome, so package reviewed and uploaded.
Everything looks fine, except that `move-all-then-remove-some' installation
method [1] (which could be hazardous sometimes) could be avoided by using
dh_install(1) next time.
[1] $(MAKE) DESTDIR=$(CURDIR)/debian/roxterm install
cp -f $(CURDIR)/debian/roxterm.xpm
$(CURDIR)/debian/roxterm/usr/share/pixmaps/
$(RM) $(CURDIR)/debian/roxterm/usr/share/doc/roxterm/COPYING
$(RM) $(CURDIR)/debian/roxterm/usr/share/doc/roxterm/AUTHORS
$(RM) $(CURDIR)/debian/roxterm/usr/share/doc/roxterm/README
Thanks for taking care of these bugs.
--
pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB 2003-03-18 <people.fccf.net/danchev/key pgp.mit.edu>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
