On Wednesday 08 July 2009, Paul Wise wrote: > 2009/7/8 Stefanos Harhalakis <[email protected]>: > > There is a bug report for libnet1 which I maintain (bug #536202). The bug > > report is for the stable version while the version in testing already > > fixes this bug. What is the proper handling for this bug report? Should I > > just close the bug as already fixed in testing? > > The Ubuntu bug report says this doesn't affect libnet1 (which you seem > to confirm in the bug), but affects libnet0, you might want to > reassign it there (with the appropriate version info). That said, > libnet0 has been removed. In stable, dnsniff uses libnet1 so it > shouldn't be affected. nemesis, paketto, sing use it in stable, all of > which are removed from sid. Fixing the bug would probably cause the > ABI to change on 64-bit architectures, making it libnet1 (or similar), > so I suggest closing the bug.
Yes, I found out that there was no problem too, shortly after sending the previous e-mail (look at the last e-mail in the bug report). I was/am waiting for a reply from the bug reporter before closing the bug. Also, the ubuntu (jsteel) information for the bug wasn't available then. Thanks for looking at it. I'll wait a bit more and then close the bug. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
