On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 11:52 +0300, George Danchev wrote: > Quoting "Zak B. Elep" <[email protected]>: > > Wait, a giant budget excluding a non-internetworked environment? Then > > again, with the government where I come from, its not too far off to > > imagine that. :P > > It simply boils down to the (strange) security policies they are > using, tightly controlled environments and physically separated > networks they are in. You don't connect sensitive systems and networks > to the public networks like internet is ;-)
Agreed. That quip was rather referring to my government's capabilities
(or lack thereof.) Sorry for that aside.
> > Thanks, all in all, that was a better take on why separate patching
> > should be done. I'll take a look at topgit (and quilt, too) and will
> > probably rebuild the package.
>
> Good.
I've pushed 0.8.0-3 to mentors with the change. I'm going to do the
same for my other RFS'd package (gtklp).
--
Zak B. Elep -- 1486 7957 454D E529 E4F1 F75E 5787 B1FD FA53 851D
I like the idea of 256 bits, though: 32 for the (Unicode) character
leaves room for 224 Bucky bits, which ought to be enough for anyone.
-- Roland Hutchinson, in alt.folklore.computers
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
