> Dear mentors, Hello,
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.6.0-2 > of my package "libvigraimpex". > > It builds these binary packages: > libvigraimpex-dev - development files for the C++ computer vision library > libvigraimpex-doc - Documentation for the C++ computer vision library > libvigraimpex2ldbl - C++ computer vision library > > The package appears to be lintian clean. > > The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: > - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libvigraimpex > - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free > - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libvigraimpex/libvigraimpex_1.6.0-2.dsc > > I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. I'm not that optimistic with the C++ code and symbols files. First, yours appear to be architecture dependent: http://qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/mole/seedsymbols?pkgname=libvigraimpex2ldbl Second, there are problems: see #521569 and the whole thread at: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/04/msg00297.html Third, as I can see from debian/rules, dh_makeshlibs won't pass any check option to dpkg-gensymbols and the default -c1 is used which is a request for FTBFS on certain architectures in that case. So, I suggest we remove the symbols part or simply disable it (pass -c0 to dpkg-gensymbols, as I did with one of my library packages bobcat) until a better solution is found or GCC people accept the solution provided at: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36022 The rest of your package looks good to me. There are no dramatic changes as compared to the previous version. -- pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB <people.fccf.net/danchev/key pgp.mit.edu> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
