Hi Hauke, On Wednesday 21 October 2009 12:09:06 Jan Hauke Rahm wrote: > Hi Francesco, > > On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 11:26:53AM +0200, Francesco Cecconi wrote: > > > * You have quite a few lines for the CFLAGS but you're building an > > > arch: all package. Is there something that is compiled or is that > > > bogus? :) > > > > done, i have updated the rules > > To be clear: you didn't have to, I just wanted to make sure you know > what you're doing. :) sure :) > > > > One last thing: why didn't you update to the latest upstream version > > > earlier? There is even a bug report about it, so I assume you missed > > > the new version somehow? > > > > yes Hauke, i missed the new upstream version :) > > Happens. > > Uploaded. many thanks Hauke > > For future releases: use changelog to document what you're doing (and > possibly why) instead of what files you're acting on. I.e. > > * Switched to debhelper 7 > > instead of > > * [debian/control]: update debhelper to version 7 > * [debian/compat]: updated to level 7 > * [debian/rules]: Updated > > It's pretty obvious that you updated debian/compat and debian/control > but not what you actually changed in the build process. If you want to > be more verbose, elaborate what you really did. > > * Switched to debhelper 7 > + debian/control: updated dependency > + debian/rules: removed unnecessary dh_* calls, changed dh_clean -k > to dh_prep > > Or similar... It is just a matter of taste after all, so just a > suggestion. :) > > Hauke Francesco
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
