Hi, I've had one package (congruity) which has been rejected recently because of a slight issue with one file not fully complying with the DFSG (CC-BY-SA 2.5 rather than 3.0), and working on another (ethos) for which the documentation would be non-free...
What is the proper way of reporting the fact that I've got upstream to agree to dual-licensing of some files? Surely this information needs to be documented somewhere in the package? Sorry if this has already been discussed multiple times in the past. I've done some searching, but for example the Reject FAQ doesn't seem to say *how* to document such special cases. Regards, Mathieu Trudel [email protected] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
