Dear mentors, I have for some time had the inert package libtwofish-dev in mind. It has been untouched since September 2002, and is not noticeably nurished by its author Niels Ferguson, ever since AES won the first price.
My query concerns the prospects of seeing an evaluation of a reworked packaging after a new audit of the code, should I undertake this out of scientific curiosity? Or, could it be the case, that the developers and mentors are a priori inclined to let this package fall into oblivion? Anyway, being a former research mathematician, I possess the skills to bring the package back in shape, but I want to protect myself against futile time waste. At present I do know that the package library uses at least two questionable logical connectives, rendering the in-built self-test of uncertain value as of this time. I would really appreciate a pointer on this subject. Best regards, Mats Erik Andersson -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
