On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 09:53:09 +0200 George Danchev <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 21:39:25 +0200 > > > > George Danchev <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Package looks good and 557049 seems to be addressed as well, at least > > > works for me;-). JFYI I just run into some leftovers in the roxterm(1) > > > and roxterm- config(1) manpages -- they both contain [FIXME: manual] > > > and [FIXME: source], and these are also shown in the man browser too. > > > This is not a huge problem per se, and the package in sid also has it, > > > but I think you might want to know about it and address it further. I > > > use that package and I'm willing to upload. > > > > Thanks. I've added the missing elements to the DocBook files the man > > pages are generated from, I hope they're OK now. This was an upstream > > change so I've uploaded a new version: > > > > - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/roxterm > > - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main > > contrib non-free - dget > > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/roxterm/roxterm_1.16.2-1.dsc > > Good. It turns out that yesterday I had installed autotools-dev by > accident in my supposed to be clean chroot, so I failed to spot the > following failure (and manage to complete the whole check cycle > including install/deinstall/running). > > checking whether i486-linux-gnu-gcc and cc understand -c and -o together... > yes > configure: error: cannot run /bin/sh ./config.sub > make: *** [config.status] Error 127 > dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2 > > Adding autotools-dev back to build-dependencies fixes it, OK, I've added that dependency back. I've duploaded a replacement, but I haven't changed the version number because I think it's better not to when it hasn't been released yet. I also tried running autotools-dev's autogen.sh, but that resulted in a lintian report: P: roxterm source: direct-changes-in-diff-but-no-patch-system po/Makevars.template so I thought I'd better avoid that for now. I'll replace my bootstrap.sh with it in future upstream versions though. > however I > wonder what were your considerations to remove it in the first place > from there? I thought the autotools were supposed to generate self-contained tarballs. I must have got the wrong idea. -- TH * http://www.realh.co.uk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
