On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 2:01 PM, Russ Allbery <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hm, isn't the obvious and simple way of implementing this change to just > create a second class of buildds that do exactly what the current ones do > but then throw out all the arch-dependent packages and only keep the > arch-independent ones? Or even more simply, just designate one > architecture (i386 perhaps) to keep all the results of the build including > the arch-independent packages? Hmm, I guess so. > That's what I assume was going to happen, which unfortunately doesn't > imply fixing any of the problems you note. Aye, we'll see I guess. -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
