Reinier Haasjes <rein...@haasjes.com> writes: > I just updated my machine to sid and rebuild the package. If I run > lintian I get the following: >> rein...@debpack:~/deb/build-area$ lintian -I --pedantic -E -v >> aiccu_20070115-11_i386.changes >> N: Setting up lab in /tmp/vpV8Z090WM ... >> N: Processing changes file aiccu_20070115-11_i386.changes ... >> N: Processing 2 packages... >> N: ---- >> N: Processing source package aiccu (version 20070115-11) ... >> N: ---- >> N: Processing binary package aiccu (version 20070115-11) ... >> N: Removing /tmp/vpV8Z090WM ... >> rein...@debpack:~/deb/build-area$ > summary: lintian clean
> If I check the lintian page for aiccu [1] there are 4 warnings. It's the > same version, I didn't change anything since the upload. Rebuilding the package apparently fixed the problems. Given that the tags are: W: aiccu: script-not-executable ./etc/pm/sleep.d/60aiccu W: aiccu: executable-not-elf-or-script ./etc/aiccu.conf W: aiccu: executable-not-elf-or-script ./usr/share/aiccu/conf-templates/aiccu.conf W: aiccu: maintainer-script-empty preinst the first three were probably fixed by dh_fixperms running properly. I don't know why that didn't happen in the original build that was uploaded to the archive, or what happened with the last tag. > Can somebody tell me why lintian.d.o is reporting warnings I don't get > local? aptitude download -t unstable aiccu followed by running lintian on the package in the archive produces the same tags as what lintian.d.o shows. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org