On Sat, Feb 06, 2010 at 03:48:08PM -0500, Asheesh Laroia wrote: > > Also, I'm just wondering: why did you remove the dependency on > "bash"? Maybe I'm being silly, but I figure it does really depend on > it.
bash is Essential and you don't explicitely depend on essential
packages but assume it's there anyway.
> (Other Debian mentors -- is it okay to upload a package whose
> version is 0.2-3 or 0.2-4 as the first Debian upload? Or should we
> instead rewrite history and pretend this is 0.2-1 when it's ready to
> go?)
There are some of the sponsors around demanding to increase the
debian version for every change of a package that hit mentors and
others that want a version just after the one in the archive.
Cheers
Christoph
--
/"\ ASCII Ribbon : GPG-Key ID: 0xD49AE731
\ / Campaign : CaCert Assurer
X against HTML : Debian Maintainer
/ \ in eMails : http://www.debian.org/
http://www.christoph-egger.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
