-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi
Dne Tue, 02 Mar 2010 10:39:10 +0100 Gabriele Giacone <1o5g4...@gmail.com> napsal(a): > Actual before or after our choice? We are redistributing it and we can > choose whether releasing it under version 2 or 3. > "What reason for that?" Why not? > Is GPL-2 better than GPL-3? I'm trying to understand differences between > them. For example because GPL-3 is not compatible with GPL-2 by itself. So once the code is under GPL-3 you can not use it in GPL-2 licensed program. Also I don't see reason why you should limit Debian users from use the program under terms of GPL-2. > >>> Why do you install startup script to usr/share/sweethome3d and create > >>> symlink in usr/bin? I think it should be directly in usr/bin. > >> I already did it for jxplorer: link without .sh extension under /usr/bin > >> that refers to the script under share/<application> > >> /usr/bin/sweethome3d -> ../share/sweethome3d/sweethome3d.sh > >> I like it but we can talk about it. > > Well I feel the symlink and different location is useless, but > I'd like to use <package>.install or dh_install but they don't rename > files. Possibly without "install -d/install" stuff. > And sweethome3d.jar was also feeling alone under /usr/share/sweethome3d ;) Okay, this is just matter of preferences. - -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkuM4usACgkQ3DVS6DbnVgRWRQCgxrnhfIv2zDqO0ZIncr0LLxhD zpUAoN7U3a67/eDkYYbDcuLGfhICpKNI =R0jq -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----