On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 03:31:41PM +0100, Tanguy Ortolo wrote: > Le lundi 22 mars 2010, Osamu Aoki a écrit : > > If you have "binary" and "build" targets explicitly mentioned in > > debian/rules, it is time to update it :-) > > > > Anyway, many people still use old rule file for debhelper. Please > > consider to update them in more readable one. > > I am considering it very seriously. :-) > But, in what I have seen of the new dh rules, there is no integrated > binary-indep target. The binary-arch integrated target would do the > same, but at the cost of what I see as a lie. > > In fact, I am looking for a documentation that explains what dh $@ does > for each call, and what the dh_auto_* do. The new maintainer guide gives > some information, but, if it is complete, that means that there are > common cases that cannot be managed that way (like interpreted web > applications, that are completely arch-independent).
This maint-guide does to some extent. But making a small joke package is the best way to leran. I packaged following as my test and then moved to hello-debhelper :-) ----- #!/bin/sh echo "Hello World!" ----- You set DH_VERBOSE=1 and you package ... you see everything. http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/maint-guide/ch-dreq.en.html#s-rules Osamu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
