I dislike the duplication and the iceweasel/mozilla style license[1]. That said it is not my role to decide about uploading ttf-takao or removing otf-ipafont.
It is a shame IPA doesn't use standard FLOSS practices like releasing early and often. 1. I also dislike DFSG #4 a lot. At least it isn't the SIL OFL, which prevents us from building the binary font file from source in the case where the author has specified a reserved font name. -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
