Hi, Thanks. I am rethinking few things.
On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 03:07:34PM +0200, [email protected] wrote: > Hi, > > I'll try to make myself clearer: > > the question is: why is e.g. debian/rules binary-indep never called on > a binary independent package, assume a PHP app. Aside from the issues discussed with Mike ... reality is once "debian/rules binary" is run, there is no need to run "debian/rules binary-indep" nor "debian/rules binary-arch". All the piecees of actions have been done. Normal package build process only calls binary as I understand. > it is clear that if dh doesn't call it, then nobody will, however the > policy manual says: ... policy discussion is not my teritory. > So, if I have an architecture independent package it would be logical > to put my commands into binary-indep; why else would it be there. > > But it is not called. When I look at my build log, this is more or > less what happens: Good point. This log and document have to match. > debian/rules build > dh build > [...] > fakeroot debian/rules binary > [...] > dpkg-deb: building package... > > No sign of debian/binary-arch and/or debian/binary-indep here. > Probably because I did not write down a specific rule This prompts me to revert back to my original text with minor updates. dpkg-buildpackage is what I am following ... not Policy. This dh.tiny is somewhat cheating to normal make file things. But this is pretty regular and easy to understand. Osamu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
