Thibaut Paumard wrote: > So, the _real_ relationship is: the conjunction (B(old) + C(new)) breaks > A and A-doc (to a point where A-doc ends-up deconfigured). > > Very clearly, C (new) must declare a "Conflicts" or a "Breaks" against B > (< new). But which one is the good choice? > Conflicts should be declared only in case of file conflicts. If, as I see, it's the case of 'doesn't work with' then use Breaks.
-- Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
