Tony Houghton writes:
> On Sun, 16 May 2010 19:38:59 +0300
> 
> George Danchev <danc...@spnet.net> wrote:
> > Also, it seems to me that build-depending on xsltproc && docbook-xsl &&
> > docbook-xml would not extremely trim the bits to be pulled as compared to
> > those pulled in the xmlto case, so don't expect big wins here ;-)
> 
> AFAICT the above trio don't depend on the (la)tex packages that xmlto
> does, and they take a long time to install.

Well, xmlto does not pull any latex packages AFAICS, and my cowbuilder --login 
test says dice wrt build-dependencies drag:

# apt-get install xmlto
Need to get 468kB/3592kB of archives.
After this operation, 20.6MB of additional disk space will be used.
Do you want to continue [Y/n]? n

# apt-get install xsltproc docbook-xsl docbook-xml
Need to get 345kB/3469kB of archives.
After this operation, 20.1MB of additional disk space will be used.
Do you want to continue [Y/n]? n

Both approaches would do, imho.

-- 
pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB <people.fccf.net/danchev/key pgp.mit.edu>


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201005162051.47592.danc...@spnet.net

Reply via email to