Am Montag, 24. Mai 2010, 12:03:15 schrieb Ansgar Burchardt: > Why not use 2.0~b1-1 as a version number? It is easier to understand and > still sorts before a stable 2.0-1 release.
Don’t know, I read it somewhere, but can’t remember where. There are so many places with different information in the web. 2.0~b1-1 would definetly be nicer. Thanks. > You should first try to contact the maintainer before doing a NMU. If > the maintainer seems inactive, contact the MIA team so the package > can be orphaned properly. See also the Developer's Reference [1]. > > [1] > <http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/beyond-pkging.html#mia-qa> Ok, I’ll try this first. Thank you and also George Danchev for your fast responses. Regards, Stefan Haller -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
