[ No need to CC me, I read the list ] On 13/07/10 19:47, Siegfried-Angel Gevatter Pujals (RainCT) wrote: > Hi Felipe, > > Thank you for taking a look at the Julius package.
No problem. > > 2010/7/13 Felipe Sateler <[email protected]>: >> - Why do you modify the manpages via sed instead of patching them? > > Because IMHO it's much easier to maintain than having a big patch > which I have to update every time a manpage changes. OK, indeed this seems like a better approach. >> - Why are there only static libraries? > > It's what upstream's build system provides, and I was told that the > libraries do stuff like calling abort() so I haven't really bothered > about it. I want to look into this some day though and maybe patch it. Well, its probably better to fix that first instead. > >> ... and I'm not quite confident about the license, specially about the >> Kyoto District Court venue thing (clause 5). > > Uhm, isn't that a common thing in licenses? It's the least clause I'd > have expected to be problematic, personally I'm more worried about the > advertising clause. In any case, I could live with it if the package > goes into non-free. The thing is that I'm not a legalese person, so I'm not confident enough to upload it. Would you mind passing the license through debian-legal and see what they say? -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
