I have uploaded a new package for sisc in response to Torsten's points. On 28 July 2010 19:04, Torsten Werner <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi David, > > On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 9:10 PM, David Banks <[email protected]> wrote: >> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "sisc". > > I have some questions / notes: > > - Is there a reason for not putting the jar files into /usr/share/java > to comply to the Debian java policy?
I now install the jars to /usr/share/java in compliance with the policy. > - May you split the changes to the upstream sources into individual > patches into debian/patches please? This is now done. > - What is means with "Relies on the java2-runtime virtual package, > which is not by default available in Debian main." in README.Debian? Ah, that was from the old debian packaging by the maintainer, which I adapted. (Statement was probably accurate in those days.) I have now removed this file altogether, as it contained nothing else. > - Please add the full text of the MPL to debian/copyright. Now done in DEP-5 form. > - Prerm should only remove alternatives when called with 'remove' as > the first argument to avoid overwriting user made changes during > upgrades. Done. > - The file seems to have a different license. Please check again. Not quite sure what you mean here? which file? Thanks for your time. Cheers, -- David Banks <[email protected]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
