On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 7:22 PM, Christoph Egger <[email protected]>wrote:
> James Goppert <[email protected]> writes: > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "open-dis". > > > > * Package name : open-dis > > Version : 2.5-1 > > Upstream Author : Don McGregor <[email protected]> > > > > * URL : http://open-dis.sourceforge.net > > * License : BSD like, with conditions > > Section : libs > > > > It builds these binary packages: > > libdis - Distributed Interactive Simulation Protocol > > > > libdis-dev - Distributed Interactive Simulation Protocol > > > > The package appears to be lintian clean. > > > > The upload would fix these bugs: 593009 > > /--- > | find cpp/DIS/ -name *.h -exec cp -v {} > $(CURDIR)/debian/tmp/usr/include/DIS/ \; > | find CppUtils/DIS/ -name *.h -exec cp -v {} > $(CURDIR)/debian/tmp/usr/include/DIS/ \; > \--- > > Any reason you're using find? One could fear you're loosing > directory structure (but there are no directories). A cp -v cpp/DIS/*.h ... > should work as well right? > > /--- > | % uscan --report-status > | Processing watchfile line for package open-dis... > | Newest version on remote site is enumerations-bin_1.1, local version is > 2.5 > | open-dis: Newer version (enumerations-bin_1.1) available on remote site: > | > http://qa.debian.org/watch/sf.php/open-dis/open-dis-enumerations-bin_1.1.tar.gz > | (local version is 2.5) > \--- > > I'd propose the following change: > > /--- > --- debian/watch.orig 2010-08-24 01:16:27.602516565 +0200 > +++ debian/watch 2010-08-24 01:16:44.714513820 +0200 > @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ > version=3 > -http://sf.net/open-dis/open-dis-(.*)\.tar\.gz<http://sf.net/open-dis/open-dis-%28.*%29%5C.tar%5C.gz> > +http://sf.net/open-dis/open-dis-([\d.]*)\.tar\.g<http://sf.net/open-dis/open-dis-%28%5B%5Cd.%5D*%29%5C.tar%5C.g> > \--- > > Which changes that to > > /--- > | % uscan --report-status > | Processing watchfile line for package open-dis... > | Newest version on remote site is 3.0, local version is 2.5 > | open-dis: Newer version (3.0) available on remote site: > | http://qa.debian.org/watch/sf.php/open-dis/open-dis-3.0.tar.gz > | (local version is 2.5) > \--- > > Any reason to not use the up-to-date version? > > Regards > > Christoph > > -- > 9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857 70CA 9655 22B9 D49A E731 > Debian Developer | Lisp Hacker | CaCert Assurer > > A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion > Q. Why is top posting bad? > Christoph, Thanks for all the help! I included your suggested changes. I attempted to upgrade to open-dis-3.0 and ran into some #include problems I would have to patch with quilt, but no big deal. I am just not sure on the compatibility with delta3d, they list opendis 2.5 as a dependency. So we might want to have 2.5 in there just in case. We can always upgrade to 3.0 later. -James P.S. Almost top posted :-)
