* Tomasz Muras <[email protected]> [100824 19:34]:
> So to summarize:
> dfsg is a conventional way of naming a package, when the original
> source has been changed. It usually happens when upstream software
> contains some non-free elements.
I do not think using "dfsg" makes sense if it was not repacked to
remove non-dfsg-free stuff.
For other reasons I think "ds" is sometimes chosen. (Though there
are not really that many other legitimate reasons).
Bernhard R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
