Thanks for the review, and the sponsorship offer. I'll work the issues, and continue this offline when it's ready.
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 7:13 AM, Michael Tautschnig <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Niels, hi list, > > [...] > > > > > Thanks for your interest in Debian. It looks like you have not received > > any feedback on nor found a sponsor for your package yet. I have spent > > some time reviewing your package and got a few comments for you, which I > > hope you find useful. > > > > Please note that I am not a Debian Developer (DD), so I cannot sponsor > > your package even if you address all my comments/remarks. Also neither > > python nor GNOME is my strong suit, so there are possibly some > > python/GNOME specific things that I have missed in my review. > > > > I think this is a prime example of how things could work, ideally. There is > absolutely no need for reviews to be only done by DDs! In fact, I think > there > already was a proposal (I couldn't dig it up in a brief search, though) > that for > each RFS people should do a review of someone else's RFS/package. Again, no > need > to be a DD to do this. All you need a DD for is *sponsoring*. Surely any > sponsor > will not upload the package without doing another brief review, but this > one > will really take a lot less time. > > [...] (very detailed and hopefully helpful review) > > @David: Once all the issues reported by Niels are fixed, I'd offer to do > the > sponsoring. Please ping me via private mail, should I miss your email to > the > list. > > Best regards, > Michael > >
