> On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 12:37 AM, Michael Tautschnig <[email protected]> wrote: > > Did he give any reasons why he doesn't simply fix this himself? It would > > have > > been useful if you had at least included an excerpt of the IRC > > communication in > > the bug report. Well, and even if he cannot find the time to fix it, > > couldn't > > Robert just sponsor the upload?! Even though Robert is in LowThresholdNmu I > > don't yet feel quite comfortable with this one. > > > > Whether it is worth an NMU or not is hard to judge: The bug report has > > severity: > > normal and gives no information whatsover of breakage caused by this > > problem - > > it just says "this is missing." > > I'm just flat out right now; I'm extremely happy for it to be NMU'd, > or I'll include it when I get a few cycles to do stuff, probably > during UDS next week. >
Uploaded given your explicit request to do so. Still, I'll refuse to do this kind of sponsoring in the future: - The amount of work this sponsoring took me is probably way more than would have been necessary; I had to explicitly request all this further information, no ready-made packages were provided for download. - The package needs some love anyhow, even lintian shows a number of warnings. - No idea why the debdiff had a *dos* encoding. Best, Michael
pgpsqsRUop0lX.pgp
Description: PGP signature
