On 2010-10-26, Gabriele Giacone <[email protected]> wrote: > On 10/26/2010 04:53 PM, Michael Shuler wrote: >> An existing source name conflict example I found: >> >> libsage2 - Source: sage >> xul-ext-sage - Source: sage-extension >> >> -extension sounds a little cleaner to me. ;) > > I'd like to keep ubiquity, name chosen by upstream. > And it's good because there are no packages named ubiquity in Debian. > > Derivatives can choose their own package names.
I think it is generally considered good practice to have a source packaeg just building one binary package to be named the same as the binary package. (Yes, I know I have violated that a couple of times with my own packages) /Sune -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
