On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 7:03 PM, Roger Light <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > >>>> dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on libgcc_s.so.1 could be avoided >>>> if "debian/libmosquittopp0/usr/lib/libmosquittopp.so.0" were not >>>> uselessly linked against it (they use none of its symbols). >>> >>> I don't know how to fix this. Any suggestions? >> >> You should go through the CFLAGS and check to see where it's linking >> against -lgcc ( IIRC, that could be wrong ). > > It's something that g++ is adding itself, it's not anywhere in CFLAGS > or CXXFLAGS. That's why it's a confusing warning. Surely it must be > using symbols, otherwise g++ wouldn't be adding it?
I honestly don't know that much about the build system anymore. I don't think this is a showstopper :) There might be a bug with the build system or something ( or it's doing something "smart", as a "feature" ) > >> W: mosquitto: wrong-name-for-upstream-changelog >> I: python-mosquitto: capitalization-error-in-description python Python >> I: libmosquitto0-dev: extended-description-is-probably-too-short >> I: mosquitto: hyphen-used-as-minus-sign > > I've fixed all of these. Confirmed. Looks ship-shape. New patches look in order, headers and all. Well done. > >> W: mosquitto-pub: empty-binary-package >> >> This is a pretty big issue. Are you not installing things to the .deb? >> Check the .install ( or makefile ) for that target > > Stupid mistake not renaming the install files after changing the > names. Fixed for both of them. Confirmed. Looks good :) > > The remaining lintian notes are: > >> P: libmosquitto0: no-upstream-changelog > > I've left this. The lintian tag page suggests a number of ways of > dealing with this for multiple binary packages, one of which is to > include it in the "main" package which is what happens here. I'm inclined to agree with you. Perhaps a similink if someone is *crazy* picky about it, but it looks like the other packages all depend on libmosquittopp, so it's in order ( at least in my eyes ). Since they're pedantic, it's not even worth overriding. > >> I: libmosquitto0: no-symbols-control-file usr/lib/libmosquitto.so.0 >> I: libmosquittopp0: no-symbols-control-file usr/lib/libmosquittopp.so.0 > > I've also left these for the moment. I don't believe they are as > relevant because this is the first packaged version. Feel free to tell > me I'm wrong :) I'm not sure at all, perhaps someone who knows lib packaging better then me can butt in > > Cheers, > > Roger > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] > Archive: > http://lists.debian.org/[email protected] > > 100% of the objections I raised look complete. Well done, really outstanding work. Keep on it! -Paul -- All programmers are playwrights, and all computers are lousy actors. #define sizeof(x) rand() :wq -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
