On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 4:00 PM, Cristian Henzel <[email protected]> wrote: >> My one question would be, have you tried to contact parcellite's >> upstream maintainer? It seems like he might be willing to hand over >> the parcellite sourceforge project. Though clipit is a better name. > Well, on his last post on http://parcellite.sf.net/ the original > programmer said that he'd encourage people to _fork_ the program, I > didn't see him mentioning that he would want to hand over the project, > that is why I never even thought about this possibility. > Of course I have mailed him before making my first release and asked him > if he was ok with the fact that I forked the program and in his reply he > also didn't mention anything about taking over parcellite, so like I > said, I didn't think about this possibility. If you want, I could mail > him again asking if he'd be interested to do that, but tbqh I find the > name ClipIt better too, probably because I came up with it... :-D
OK. I was just wondering if you had contacted him. If he didn't suggest it, then there's probably no need to pursue that any further. > I just made a new upstream release to fix a couple of open issues and > have updated the debian package on mentors.debian.net to the latest > version (1.3.4). I've build and tested this version, and overall it looks great. It's lintian clean, builds fine, and functions as expected. One small thing I noticed was that the Build-Depends in debian/control on autotools-dev seems unnecessary. I can build the package without it in a clean sid chroot. Thanks! Andrew Starr-Bochicchio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
